apparently they lied about that because the grenades actually did kill someone. They seemed pretty frickin' lethal to me.
-
-
-
Read the article, non-lethal grenades caused fire. Where's the lie??

-
lie is they caused a lethal so they're lethal.. I'm not sure U know what lethal means
-
they were killed by fire, not the grenades.. the grenades can't kill ergo non-lethal....learn to logic better

-
you must be tons of fun at parties @CambatWombat I can see why there is violence in your monicker!
-
how can you see why there's violence in my nick (debatable) from my tweet?? Pls try for a more witty & erudite riposte

-
this just in ..... you're a moron.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ccollinsjr@nytimes guess those grenades were actually lethal -
that was the very first thought that came to my mind, too bad these cops still thought it a great idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Apparently NOT nonlethal...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hope china doesn't use this as an excuse to further heighten the tensions in Korean waters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nonlethal?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ha ha.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SK coastguards must've learned their lesson after one their own was stabbed by these illegal Chinese fishermen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.