Hey, @nytimes. You are again missing the important point: Trump has lost almost all top military for a GOP nominee.pic.twitter.com/qzGOp5UuNg
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Hey, @nytimes. You are again missing the important point: Trump has lost almost all top military for a GOP nominee.pic.twitter.com/qzGOp5UuNg
Wow. You mean of the literally millions upon millions of current and ex-military figures, 90 support Trump? That's newsworthy.
And by comparison Mitt Romney had over 500. Hardly something to brag about.
No mention of the comparison number supporting @HillaryClinton or the number who supported Romney in '12. That is crap reporting.
more garbage promoted by the New York Times, thanks guys, we'll remember you foisted this buffoon on the world, really we will
shouldn't it be "only 88" military figures?
All toy soldiers from Toy Story.
@TheLeadCNN this guy @MittRomney got 500 what are you boasting about @realDonaldTrump inept!!!
excellent news. Wonder what they make of this
pic.twitter.com/TIf2FLjB1g
Notorious misogynists, everyone. Some back Trump because they WON'T be led by a woman. It is true.
maybe you should check out #VetsAgainstTrump
Mitt had over 500! Why are you so intent on pushing The Donald? USA doesn't need the DT's!
The glossing over of trump's 88 compared to Romney's 500 in 2012 is awfully shoddy reporting. Great job, @maggieNYT!
Read some of their records...so much for "extreme vetting"
Trump, "I know more about Gen. Tso's Chicken than I know about ISIS." Dylan: Trump song. #RobbingUsBarrenhttps://youtu.be/stIBKt2i26Y
from the U.S.? Russia? North Korea?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.