Yup. RT @nytimes: Brands pay people like Kim Kardashian thousands of dollars to praise products on social media. But is it an ad?
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The NY Times claims Kim Kardashian story is news. But is it click-bait?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes in a new media vechicle. Still promotes advertiser and reaches a target audience
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapna yeah its a fucking ad, they pay her to ADvertise their products.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sapna Celebrities are hired, so it's an ad. A boring, uncreative, fallback of an ad. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@sapna SAPNA I CLICKED THIS WITHOUT KNOWING IT WAS YOUR ARTICLE I AM SO PROUD - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sapna in a traditional definition no, but it's still a form of promotion. Still falls into marketing mix.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
she work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Half the world watches Kim & Co. It's an instant money spinner for them. Way cheaper than paying ad. agencies or top mag's.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@nytimes almost as funny as Hillary paying YOU, the New York Times, to bash ONLY Trump and not her. Weird.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course it is!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give us po' folks a little credit. We knew that...nothing new!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

