she shouldn't be saying this while she sits on the bench
-
-
-
Why not? He has no cases in front of the SCOTUS. His fraud cases are civil
-
it has nothing to do with his court cases, SCOTUS is supposed to be apolitical.
-
They can have their opinions. Scalia certainly did. Thomas does
-
they all have a slant, but I don't recall them commenting on on going elections; and if they did they shouldn't have.
-
Socializing with Cheney when he had a case before SCOTUS is a bigger deal to me. That was just wrong.
-
I don't agree with those either, SCOTUS should be as apolitical as it can be.
-
As long as they stay impartial doesn't bother me. Swaying cases with partisan crap is where I draw the line.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@LBSURF01 Senile old fart can't stay awake long enough to make a logical decision without her meds. Trump will retire her. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Mr. Crazy hair is a poo poo head.
@nytimesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is not a Politically Correct statement coming from a Supreme Court Justice - does it pose a problem?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not for her to say as a Justice...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No worries RBG, we've got your back!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
who cares. Grumpy old hag
-
who's accomplished more in her life than you ever will.
-
build the wall
-
get snipped.
-
reported. Terrorist threat
-
cool story bro.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.