By GOP reasoning, shouldn't nukes be allowed by the 2nd amendment?
-
-
-
That's not GOP reasoning. It's also not what the 2nd Amendment says.
-
2nd amendment specifies "arms", of which nukes are a type.
-
Read a book. Read history. Get some education. By definition Nukes are ordinance not arms as defined in the Cindtitution
-
Research the topic from a scientific viewpoint. Stats are very clear on this issue.
-
Stats have nothing to do with legal definitions. Nukes are defined as ordinance, not arms as defined in the Constitution
-
if it is ONLY what was spelled out at the time of the constitution why aren't ONLY muskets allowed?
-
First I never it was only what was spelled out at the time of the Constitution. I said nukes are not arms
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can't e pro-cop AND pro-gun.
#VoteOutGOP -
Is that why most cops are pro-gun rights, because you can't be pro-cop and pro -gun?
-
Most. In the US. Huge number. I guess you asked ALL of them. How much did you spend on the analysis, troll?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
POTUS needs to be protected, an extreme of the need for guns, are you this important
-
Yes, I am. So are you.
-
fair enough, I'll put it another way, is your life threatened everyday while doing your job
-
Maybe, I teach history.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
the voted down Kate's Law. Destroying Their own credibility on the subject.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait - GUN CONTROL is the issue that recent racial animus demands a response to? We're fucked if people are this dumb.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Time to hold hands and cross the aisle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.