If we don't stop "publications" like Gawker and their reprehensible behavior, who will? None of us can afford to... Theil can, yay!
-
-
-
Who is to say what is reprehensible?
-
So you think freedom of speech applies to a group publishing someone's private sex tape? You're joking, right?
-
Yes, actually I do.
-
Yes, I'm SURE the NYTimes and other a-c-t-u-a-l publishers would submit a sex tape to the public. Suuure... Dream on...
-
So we should have continue to publish the naked pictures of Jennifer Lawrence and the other girls?
-
You two don't understand the slippery slope and how important and sacred the first amendment is
-
the other is publishing the sex tape. 2 very different things.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which is exactly what Gawker deserved after treating Hogan like he was a can of garbage to be dumped out in public view...
-
The first amendment is so important that it's listed as number one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So dishonest, predatory scumbags who pose as journalists should be worried now? Good deal. Real journalism is unaffected.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, it is companies under guise of being legitimate "media" & use the 1st ammendment as a shield that threaten real press freedom!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tired of Instigating journalists who abuse their pen power;time u all get called out on ur obnoxious behavior.Ur not entitled
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@katierogers Also the need for and use of money to socially engineer societyhttps://ludwitt.wordpress.com/2016/05/26/the-thielgawker-saga-highlights-role-of-money-in-legal-system/ … -
Tweet unavailable
-
Um - where did I say there was no law? Law for everything that clever lawyers and money can use vs anybody
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No it does not, and yes the media a should not be exempt from publishing hidden cam sex tapes just bc they are
#celebritiesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The threat is the theory of liability on which Hogan prevailed, not the fact that he was able to afford his day in court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
thanks yall. Next NYT feature: "Money grants privilege." Fucking groundbreaking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.