The role of JOURNALISTS? Baquet wouldn't recognize a journalist - or an act of journalism - if he were confronted with one. But of course he never has been. NYT was already a propaganda sheet when he took over. They just hadn't declared themselves yet.
-
-
-
-
-
Lesson NOT learned from Iraq & 2003-4 either.
-
-
-
Wow, the lack of self-awareness is stunning.
-
-
-
@NYT said there was no threat from Russia in 2016#ButHerEmails was their #1 story throughout the campaign. So no credibility.
-
-
-
-
And to hold information until it does the most harm to a specific politician is definitely a political act and most probably could be construed as election interference!
-
-
-
@EricBoehlert@mmfa@brianstelter OMG@deanbaquet excuses "both sideism" as "sophisticated objectivity." We just aren't sophisticated enough to get it. His hubris and blindness are breathtaking. YOU don't get it, Baquet. That's the kind of rationalizing that got us to this point.
-
-
-
If you ever want another penny from me, you will not publish Bret Stephens.
-
-
-
The NYTimes has never regained the credibility it lost when Bill Keller quashed the warrantless wiretap story in 2004 at the White House's behest. An election in which the voters can't know that one of the candidates is running a vast criminal enterprise is a sham.
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.