-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes infinity!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Are you fucking serious? I thought you were a legitimate paper, not the Daily Mail.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Because what this historical moment needed was some pseudoscience clickbait questioning the validity of gay parents. Great job,
@nytimes! -
Just click the article and stop being fake outraged
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is a joke right? Kids favour one parent over the other all the time. They change it up and go through fazes. Like one day they like dolls and the next they’re Emo and listening to ambient noises of the sloth.
#journalism#joke Can’t have your cake and eat it too mum. -
They play parents off each other all the time. That doesn’t mean they love one more than the other. The only instance where one parent is loved “more” is in abusive relationships. That and you love people for different reasons, that doesn’t mean you love one “more” than the other
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Impossible, that’s unnatural and not endorsed by any religion on earth
-
2 is better than NOTHING.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No all for everyone doing what they want but I've witnessed first hand this shit causes a confusion. Kids need a role model of both male and female
#sorrynotsorry no hate towards ppls lifestyles but it is what it is -
You're an idiot. I've witnessed firsthand the kind of shit your brand of casual homophobic bigotry caused. No hate, is what it is.
-
Anecdotal
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You: (posts hateful homphobic bullshit) Also you: I'm not homophobic Ok buddy
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.