Please stop calling bomb recipients "Trump critics". Trump has publicly named each of them repeatedly, they're Trump targets.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The really important traits are these: not one of them exploded and they had timers on them. They’re hoaxes, even though the liberal media insists on calling them “bombs.”
-
So, it doesn't matter because they weren't functional? Is this the new right-wing talking point?
-
It’d be nice if the media was honest. That’s all
-
What is not "honest" about this article? Please, tell me.
-
They’re not “bombs.” Do you understand?
-
They are bombs. Just because they didn't blow up doesn't mean they aren't bombs. I can't believe this is the right-wing talking point the lemmings are coalescing around.
-
Something that’s intended to look like a bomb, but is not a bomb, is not a bomb.
-
Seriously? That is like saying, "I pointed a fake gun at you but you shouldn't have shot me because it wasn't a real gun." The point is the threat. Whether or not the bomb was "real" is irrelevant.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If these had been sent to Republicans this country would be on fire right now. What a mess.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Democrats did it themselves to blame Trump...
-
You have NO PROOF. Stop bullshitting, please.
-
Democrats lost their mind since Trump won Presidency. What other proof u want???
-
That's not concrete proof. Where's the paper trail? Where's the invoices of the bombing material paid by the DNC? That's your evidence...and it's in your ass.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I don't need luck, sport. I have logic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They also have not gone off. Doesn’t anyone find that the least bit curious? That these “bombs” are clearly being sent to people critical of Trump or people he’s mentioned at rallies yet not a single one has actually gone off? Thank god they haven’t but a bit strange no?
-
A bit strange how Trumplandia always goes straight to whatever conspiracy theory justifies their hate.
-
I am simply asking a question. It isn’t strange to you? No matter the outcome, whoever is doing this should have every single charge thrown against them and face the severest sentence possible.
-
It's not a question. It's a passive accusation. Taking a question make on the end of a statement doesn't change that. For example, if I said, "Does it seem to anyone else that Just My Thoughts may be a child molester?"
-
Cute try, but a total non sequitur. If you don’t want to engage in actually answering if you think it is strange or not there’s no point in a back and forth. It is a legitimate question. If you don’t think it’s strange fine. Move along.
-
(1) It's not a non sequiter. And (2) the whole thing is strange but unlike you, I wait for facts before jumping to conclusions based on preconcieved notions I want to defend.
-
For example, "Does it seem strange to anyone that Just My Opinions doesn't deny the fact that he may be a child molester?" Do you see how a passive accusatio is built into the question? It is a very common right-wing rhetorical technique.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.