But she didn't in fact prove it.
-
-
-
He didn't deny that she's Native American - he denied he made the offer. Which is a lie.
-
Yes, if true. But why a headline focusing on that, when the story here is that the test evinces that EW lied in law school faculty descriptions (Penn) and applications (Harvard) about her ancestry? I suspect DT will admit to the offer and properly savage her claim of vindication
-
The analysis of her genetic data performed by Carlos Bustamante, a professor of genetics at Stanford and advisor to Ancestry and 23 and Me, said the facts suggest that she absolutely has Native American ancestor in her pedigree. Test says yes, so Trump should pay up
-
The test proved that you or I have more Native blood in us than she does. This proved once and for all that her stories about her heritage are in fact false. One relative 7-10 generations ago doesn't mean you are a Native American.
-
I know you weren't replying to me but. I have zero NA ancestry - I'm an eastern European Jew, born in Europe. Americans who have NA ancestry actually have NA ancestors, however distant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He should donate .0019% of the money.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The DNA test says Warren has a 1/1024 chance of having distant relative who was Native American (from South America). That's less than .0001%. That's not considered Native American DNA test also proves Warren lied when claiming she had grandparent who was fully Native American.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Six to 10 generations ago? The "one drop" rule is alive and well in the Democratic Party and at the New York Times.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
She’s not Native American. I can go back 10 generations and show there’s and Native American in my family history too. But I don’t claim I’m Native American!
-
She's claiming its part of her family dna, like many of us could state, not in its entirety, duh!
-
She used the .00096% bloodline for financial gain... her results prove shes 99.99%+ pure white
-
No she didn’t.
-
The controversy was sparked in late April 2012, when the Boston Herald revealed[1] that in the late 1990s Harvard Law School had promoted Warren as a Native American faculty member, based on a report in The Harvard Crimson in 1996[2]
-
Yeah, none of that resulted in “financial gain” as you claimed.
-


$350k a year because she taught as a minority law teacher. Are you really this obtuse? Or you just pretending to be?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.