The @GOP and the evangelical's want total control over women bodies They dont want women to be allowed abortion or birth control They want to tell you who you can marry Next we will have to be covered from head to toe like the women in Saudi
-
-
-
This opinion of yours is utter lunacy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Life after Roe" = 60,000,000 dead.
-
I guess you can add that to the 100 million that died because trump being president...... or something like that. Idk, I got that from Cnn.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Liberal madness!
-
Nope, just a sad possibility.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Women who voted for Trump knew this was going to happen but they did it anyway. They were following in the foot steps of the Commander's wife, sacrificing their individual rights for the illusion of security.
-
You know abortion is not a right, right? It’s only legal. Also women can vote however they want. It’s 2018 being sexist is not cool anymore, bud.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Life after Roe means some cult-like religion will take over the country and force women into servitude and become surrogate mothers of high ranking members? That seems extreme.
-
I think it means women and men will become more scientifically aware of the human reproductive act and how it works since the beginning of all human life, in general and in particular.
-
Any person having sex should be adequately scientifically aware that the act results in a baby. If not, they are sorely miseducated.
-
The act MAY result in a pregnancy, which would mean there is now a baby, whether or not the baby makes it to one stage of maturity or another. It should be known that they are engaging in the human reproductive act, not a sport, nor a celebration of independence or entertainment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's not going to happen since we will never know what's in those 100,000 pages of Kavanaugh's background. We cannot blindly appoint anyone with possible criminal or civil infractions to sit as Supreme Court Judge.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What exactly do you believe the overturning of Roe v. Wade would do?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That ridiculous picture is worth a million Trump votes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Protect the rights of women. Simple. If he is against that, he shouldn't be on the SCOTUS.
-
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness... for ALL. Not to be abridged based on a person's size, location, or ability to audibly voice one's concerns. Celebrate new life!
-
And you're free to think that, but we are talking about the law of the land which should stand to grant control of reproductive rights to those using their bodies to do the actual reproduciton.
-
,To "do the actual reproduction" -- yeah, I have no legal problem with people doing that. I'm opposing those who call actual killing "
#reproduction" or "reproductive rights."pic.twitter.com/LILWq27kAh
-
And again, you're shifting the argument. No one is saying kill babies. You say a small amount of cells is a baby. I don't. The law has to stand that so we can both have our opinion on it. You're completely free to think it's murder and not engage in it.
-
,Yes, someone IS saying babies are being killed. I am. There is no euphemism that changes that fact.
#Abortionists are paid to do it. They admit it. Why can't you? I'm not advocating for free thought & expression just for adults, but for innocent, tiny, young human life, too.pic.twitter.com/ILkPUCBAe7
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.