Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
nytimes's profile
The New York Times
The New York Times
The New York Times
Verified account
@nytimes

Tweets

The New York TimesVerified account

@nytimes

Where the conversation begins. Follow for breaking news, special reports, RTs of our journalists and more. Visit http://nyti.ms/2FVHq9v  to share news tips.

New York City
nytimes.com
Joined March 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The New York Times‏Verified account @nytimes Sep 1

    Life After Roehttps://nyti.ms/2Cb7psO 

    4:12 PM - 1 Sep 2018
    • 157 Retweets
    • 429 Likes
    • Iwillnevertire Mort Farshchi Haydee Stive Joseph Huben Kimono Blossom Anoop Maya Gilmore capitalism failed but dont worry we got this
    65 replies 157 retweets 429 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Ellen Reeher Morris‏ @EllenMorris1222 Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        The @GOP and the evangelical's want total control over women bodies They dont want women to be allowed abortion or birth control They want to tell you who you can marry Next we will have to be covered from head to toe like the women in Saudi

        3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
      3. Eric‏ @ericj1971 Sep 1
        Replying to @EllenMorris1222 @nytimes @GOP

        This opinion of yours is utter lunacy.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. diogenes‏ @diogenes323bc Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        "Life after Roe" = 60,000,000 dead.

        2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
      3. tacotrumpfan69‏ @tacotrumpfan69 Sep 1
        Replying to @diogenes323bc @nytimes

        I guess you can add that to the 100 million that died because trump being president...... or something like that. Idk, I got that from Cnn.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. MatthewJshow‏ @MatthewJshow Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        Liberal madness!

        1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
      3. Doc_Aybolit‏ @Doc_Aybolit Sep 1
        Replying to @MatthewJshow @nytimes

        Nope, just a sad possibility.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. thomas lee‏ @LeeRaymondtom Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        Women who voted for Trump knew this was going to happen but they did it anyway. They were following in the foot steps of the Commander's wife, sacrificing their individual rights for the illusion of security.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. tacotrumpfan69‏ @tacotrumpfan69 Sep 1
        Replying to @LeeRaymondtom @nytimes

        You know abortion is not a right, right? It’s only legal. Also women can vote however they want. It’s 2018 being sexist is not cool anymore, bud.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Verum Catholico‏ @MReading7 Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        Life after Roe means some cult-like religion will take over the country and force women into servitude and become surrogate mothers of high ranking members? That seems extreme.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. Tracy Hernandez‏ @Organics4Free Sep 1
        Replying to @MReading7 @nytimes

        I think it means women and men will become more scientifically aware of the human reproductive act and how it works since the beginning of all human life, in general and in particular.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Verum Catholico‏ @MReading7 Sep 1
        Replying to @Organics4Free @nytimes

        Any person having sex should be adequately scientifically aware that the act results in a baby. If not, they are sorely miseducated.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      5. Tracy Hernandez‏ @Organics4Free Sep 1
        Replying to @MReading7 @nytimes

        The act MAY result in a pregnancy, which would mean there is now a baby, whether or not the baby makes it to one stage of maturity or another. It should be known that they are engaging in the human reproductive act, not a sport, nor a celebration of independence or entertainment.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      6. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Elnora Butler‏ @ButlerElnora Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        That's not going to happen since we will never know what's in those 100,000 pages of Kavanaugh's background. We cannot blindly appoint anyone with possible criminal or civil infractions to sit as Supreme Court Judge.

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. Blaine Grisham‏ @BlaineGrisham Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        What exactly do you believe the overturning of Roe v. Wade would do?

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Stormy Tapper‏ @MomcorpsFRC Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        pic.twitter.com/Q8wqYUXOjc

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Skip Bittman‏ @BittmanSkip Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        That ridiculous picture is worth a million Trump votes.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Peter LeFleur‏ @8McCann Sep 1
        Replying to @nytimes

        Protect the rights of women. Simple. If he is against that, he shouldn't be on the SCOTUS.

        4 replies 1 retweet 1 like
      3. Tracy Hernandez‏ @Organics4Free Sep 1
        Replying to @8McCann @nytimes

        Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness... for ALL. Not to be abridged based on a person's size, location, or ability to audibly voice one's concerns. Celebrate new life!

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      4. Peter LeFleur‏ @8McCann Sep 3
        Replying to @Organics4Free @nytimes

        And you're free to think that, but we are talking about the law of the land which should stand to grant control of reproductive rights to those using their bodies to do the actual reproduciton.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Tracy Hernandez‏ @Organics4Free Sep 5
        Replying to @8McCann @nytimes

        ,To "do the actual reproduction" -- yeah, I have no legal problem with people doing that. I'm opposing those who call actual killing "#reproduction" or "reproductive rights."pic.twitter.com/LILWq27kAh

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      6. Peter LeFleur‏ @8McCann Sep 5
        Replying to @Organics4Free @nytimes

        And again, you're shifting the argument. No one is saying kill babies. You say a small amount of cells is a baby. I don't. The law has to stand that so we can both have our opinion on it. You're completely free to think it's murder and not engage in it.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Tracy Hernandez‏ @Organics4Free Sep 5
        Replying to @8McCann @nytimes

        ,Yes, someone IS saying babies are being killed. I am. There is no euphemism that changes that fact. #Abortionists are paid to do it. They admit it. Why can't you? I'm not advocating for free thought & expression just for adults, but for innocent, tiny, young human life, too.pic.twitter.com/ILkPUCBAe7

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      8. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info