Floating? Do they know about San Onofre?http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-chapple-san-onofre-20180815-story.html …
-
-
-
This plan is insane. We can't even handle the ones on land much less their waste.
-
Which ones ... the ones in America's nuclear navy? LMAO ...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
An accident waiting to happen

-
One word. Chernobyl.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Right, a nuclear sub at the surface.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren’t nuclear powered warships and submarines “floating nuclear power plants” too?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fake news Every American aircraft carrier is a floating nuclear power plant...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
do you want Godzilla? because this is how you get Godzillahttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1033953533190721536 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m sure there’s nothing to worry about. Putin is Trump’s best friend.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
A floating nuclear power plant. Sounds perfectly safe. Was it christened Titanic II or Chernobyl II?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m no scientist but a floating nuclear power plant given yukoshima and Chernobyl seems risky. Any nuclear power plant by water is not ideal. It’s hard to contain the cooling water which leaks contaminated water...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This seems like a very bad idea. Russia’s record of transparency with nuclear safety is non-existent. We only know about Russian-Ukraine accidents when safety monitors elsewhere report them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's with the fascination of nuclear power plants by both Puuuutin and Trump? (Flynn) .. what's that about?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Because the risk of nuclear waste seeping into the ocean wasn’t high enough?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
