If the Supreme Court was moving significantly more liberal than the public I’m confident the NYTimes would be applauding the move
-
-
-
The point of the article: 1) the Supreme Court is already more right than public opinion right now. 2) The court is moving much more to the right than public opinion, perhaps for generations. 3) What will it be like when the court rules against the majority of what people want?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When the media lists so hard to the left, that anything right of that is Nazi, racist, or deplorable, the people become more and more conservative. The U.S. has also been there before.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Confirming a judge was no big deal for the first 190 years of our history until liberals turned the court into a progressive battle field. Liberals know their crazy ideas can’t be implemented by legislation they need judges to create laws
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
We have to see the constitution as a living document otherwise we’re just stuck where we were more than 200 years ago, and a fantasy version of it at that
-
It’s a living document in that it can be amended, and there is a way to do that. So feel free to propose an amendment and try to get enough support to pass it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What happens when the Supreme Court becomes leftist Marxist activist that legislate from the Bench. Here is an example of how a biased garbage media panders to Trump-haters with cynical headlines. That is precisely why they are the enemie of the people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the American public was actually as far left as you think it is, then they could get laws passed the actual prescribed way, instead of relying on judges to advance causes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The SCOTUS isnt supposed to be Conservative or Liberal. It has one job: hold to the Constitution. Not international law. Not the will of the people. The fact you think holding the laws to the original intent of the Constitution is seen as Conservative says much about you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Definitely worth a read. Too much "what if" and fear mongering in my opinion though. When the court was liberal http://supremecourtdatabase.org there were the same concerns about their potential impact. IMO we should quit giving power to the government for things we should own ourselves
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
is that red for right wing or red for a sea of blood? Same thing i guess....
-
You can interpret it in so many fun ways :)
-
i went for "The Shining" option
-
Mines more disgusting, so I will refrain.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.