wouldn't it be more therapeutic to keep letting people destroy it?
-
-
-
Hi Sam
Hope you're feeling much better -
home, letting it sink in, thanks!
-
Best place to be! Much love
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Doesn’t matter if he has a star or not, he is still President and Hillary isn’t. That’s all that matters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The continued destruction of Trump's star essentially guarantees he'll continue to have newest and shinest one. SJW's can't see past their noses.
-
I think the only one who cares about having the newest and shiniest star is Trump himself.
-
Are you suggesting Trump is secretly funding his own star's destruction? That would be interesting
-
Haha no. But I mean, I guess indirectly through every depraved act he takes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is news? Pathetic....
-
I feel that his star should be removed from Hollywood because his name should not associate with the horrors of Hollywood, including pedophiles and rapists. If he were to have his name on anything, at least place such a monument or memoir in a good location.
-
True but he did earn it and I think its the choice of the person who owns the star if they want it removed or not. I see your point but ultimately if our President doesnt want the star there he will remove it. The monument would be a nice touch though =3
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.