What the fuck is wrong with you people. So they should have let the bear maul the man to death? Get some perspective.
-
-
-
You assume the risk when you step into their habitat. If you are gonna visit, at least know they are dangerous. Polar bears are decreasing, we are way too many.
-
So you say they should have let him die? Great.
-
Not in the least. A good choice would be to keep tourist away from the habitat of endangered species particularly if they are apex predators. They can take their stupid f****** pictures somewhere else.
-
You do realise your statement applies to half the globe, right?
-
Over half the globe is water.
-
If we really are being that pedantic, that water is full of endangered apex predators
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is so unbelievably sad
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They claim it was self-defence, but they invaded his territory, not the other way around. So basically the polar bear's behavior came from self-defense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe time to rethink the plan here so you don’t have to kill the very thing people are there to see?...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tragic and immoral
-
So Tragic!
-
Would it of been better if it killed the guy first?
-
No but killing it is Heartless.
-
What were they supposed to do, ask it to sit down for a quick chat over tea? I agree it’s terrible but come on...
-
I understand you bro,but we both know the decision that was taken was terrible
-
If we can’t travel without “having” to kill wildlife in their natural habitat, we should stay home.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.