Hey @AskAManager haven’t you been saying this for years?
-
-
-
Yes indeed!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"volunteering"


Thanks for that laughThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They start see you as their maid. Never buy coffee or cigarettes for boss. I refused to buy cigarettes. Actually said do it this time but never again. Held my guns. I was promoted fast. Got sick n had to go pt. They kept me on full benefits. Must respect yourself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.... Ah yes, but that 52% that are men, ignore that larger number
-
48% more likely to be women is not the same thing as 48% women.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The easy jobs?
-
Not necessarily. More like the jobs that other people don’t want to do.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Duh, patriarchy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So what you're saying is... 52% of those volunteering for thankless jobs are more likely to be men?
-
no... it means that if 100 men volunteer we will have 148 women
-
You're gonna have to explain that one to me. This says 48% of people who say "yes" to the thankless task are women... which means more men are saying yes to doing those tasks... Your math isn't making sense to me, sorry.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Good to know you're a straight-up dick. I'm admitting the math doesn't make sense to me and asking for help analyzing it. Clearly, you understand a lot less than I do.

-
It says they are 48% *MORE LIKELY* to be women, not that 48% of them are women.
-
Thank you. I think my brain missed the /more/ and read likely or something crossed wires up there. I see what it's saying now. :)
-
No problem!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So 52% more likely to be men?
-
For every 100 men who volunteer, 148 women volunteer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.