Any young man out there who is not registered to vote should stop marching immediately and go and register. If not we marching for free. #votingStyleNov6
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The left wants to repeal the 1st and the 2nd, with the rest not far behind.
-
If you think that, you are either willfully ignorant or a bot
-
This is literally an article about people on the left who want to get rid of freedom of speech. I dont think I need to even provide evidence of their hatred of the 2nd.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I see a few commentors here stating that free speech does not absolve an individual from repercussions, with the implication leaning towards the legal sense. Free speech does not grant a citizen asylum from another fellow’s societal indictment, as ...
-
that would infringe the latter’s constitutional rights. Free speech grants one the ability to say whatever they please, without legal consequence, but not without social penalty.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
In this nation, an employer may relinquish whomever they wish. If the individual finds the cause of their termination to be unjust, the issue can be taken to the company’s Human Resources Department, or our judicial court system.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You may not realise it, but I did. If the employer so wishes, the can terminate a person under employment at their own discretion. Even if it is over but opinion. Is the action just? That is up to the individual to decide. If the dismissed feels fit they can rebuttal via ...
-
various means. It does not matter whether the business owner’s cause is morally unjust or not. Either the court system, or society itself will decide.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can already tell this is a terrible opinion piece
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you guys approve the same article once every two weeks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“[W]hen they had the Power in their hands, those Graces were strangers in their gates!” Daniel Defoe had these hypocrites pegged in 1702. https://www.bartleby.com/27/12.html pic.twitter.com/4jjYbbCSB9
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is an insane piece. It's so confused as to what free speech actually is. Equating changing attitudes to pornography to relinquishing free speech? And the passing of hideous legislation against women and gay people as a victory for conservative free speech? Silly article
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Free speech is absolutely essential. However the far right thinks that also means absolution from consequences for exercising that right. Free speech doesn't mean you get to say heinous things with impunity.
-
It does if the punity comes from government, otherwise the speech wasn't "free."
-
In regards to this article it you are right. I'm by no means a constitutional expert or anywhere near it but it really feels like they are bending the spirit of the 1st to push through partisan rulings.
-
Different rulings require finding exceptions to free speech protections.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.