Why is it “fiery” and not reasoned, sound, or compelling? Stereotype much, @nytimes?
-
-
-
Thank you! I guess Latinas must be “fiery”. All that hot sauce.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Apparently she would rather have more problems than concern for our safety. And the ban doesn't affect all Muslim countries, only a few due to possible safety concerns.
-
Most acts of American terrorism are perpetrated by Americans. When they are not, top countries of origin are Saudi Arabia & Egypt that are not included on the list. Care to explain.
-
We can't block Americans from entering the country genius. And the counties on the list can't provide info om who is comong in, it's really that simple.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
shes entitled to her opinion but thats the beauty of it all—the majority wins!
-
Always! Well, with the exception of the presidency! So much for beauty of the majority, eh? :)
-
Wrong, he did win the majority of the electoral college. We do not elect a president from the votes of California. The beauty of our system is the whole country gets a voice. He crushed Hillary in counties and the electorate. It wasn’t close, get a clue
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1.Agree or disagree with Sotomayor, we need to examine her legal reasoning, which if looking at this decision in broader context reflects a legitimate constitutional concern regardless of whether you think the SCOTUS decision is correct. For example, Roberts' jurisprudence on...
-
travel ban - act itself is 'facially neutral' - has been used by SCOTUS to justify constitutionality of death penalty and we've consistently seen racialized motivations for & discriminatory application of capital punishment despite statutory neutrality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And she would be right.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you Judge- there are too many who are sorely lacking in reasoning ability and continue to make the same mistakes over and over again
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When RBG dissents it’s intellectual, articulate, and activistic but when Sotomayor dissents it’s “fiery”???? Latinx women can’t have an opinion without the heavily racialized/sexualized tropes of the “fiery Latina”
-
Exactly. AND It's not the first time... https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/supreme-court-says-police-may-use-evidence-found-after-illegal-stops.html … see 3rd para CNN is guilty too: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/supreme-court-says-police-may-use-evidence-found-after-illegal-stops.html … Gross. Tiresome.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Apparently the only one not blinded by whiteness, an advantage which allows her to actually read the constitution without skipping whole sections
-
Are you saying she's the only non-white member on the supreme court? Do you know anything about the supreme court?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I wish she had said an apology should be given for Democrat President Roosevelt putting Japanese-Americans into concentration camps in WW II. Korematsu was reversed in 2018
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.