How did a woman who thinks that today’s “travel ban” decision is equivalent to the decision that endorsed the detention of Japanese-Americans during World War II become a Supreme Court Justice???
-
-
-
She EARNED her seat, unlike Gorsuch.
-
.
@nytimes, does Sean Hannity write your headlines? -
Thank you. OMG "lashed out." She read a descending opinion...

-
Geez.. dissenting.
-
It’s the
@nytimes they are not big fans of women. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The word choice gives the lie to any pretense at unbiased reporting. “Sotomayor... cited the president” would have done the job. Yet another confirmation canceling my subscription was the right thing to do.
-
Samesies...
-
Ditto. Did the
@nytimes ever say Scalia "lashed out"? Because he did. -
Another satisfied ex-subscriber here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are tone policing a Supreme Court Justice?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Lashing out? Really. NYTs - this is the 4th time in two days that I have been deeply disappointed in the “slant” of your paper. This one is appalling. You are about to lose a subscriber - and I’m not alone.
-
When did presenting facts become 'lash out'?
-
Right around the time voicing dissent became uncivil and unpatriotic. If you want the media to consider you respectable you’ll want to grab a tiki torch and start locking children in cages.
-
So true and yet so shameful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If by "lashed out at" you mean quoted at length what he said and tweeted.
-
‘Stop crying! Be quiet!’ / the abuser continues to slam his victim against the wall. // Hurting people isn’t good, sure... but don’t you agree the victim should stay civil? Nobody likes someone who ‘lashes out’ with a dissenting opinion! /// what?
@adamliptak back me up man!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
