Do you care?
-
-
-
-
I bet you love Obama and Clinton, right? Sure you do; you don't really care about
#HumanRights, you care about appearances, and Trump looks like the policies that Obama and Bush and Clinton enacted – he's the embodiment of their greed.#WeCameWeSawHeDiedpic.twitter.com/P3oj7muHPM -
Tweet unavailable
-
I'm not sure how helpful it is to mock voters. As for doing harm to the 99%, that honor goes to the neoliberal neocon duopoly – both the Dems and the GOP – that is really an oligarchic kleptocracy. GOP stab me in the front Dems stab me in the back I vote for not being stabbedpic.twitter.com/xzTYK5HprA
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I have no business being in the
@Gop. I am not a REPUBLICAN, I am an INDEPENDENT. I only voted Republican because they were the only party with any semblance of sanity. I appears that I’ll be voting that way again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, you don't care, as is evidenced by your rabid attacks. The few times you wrote about the
#DeporterInChief Obama you mitigated his culpability; now that Trump is POTUS, you can't help yourselves – every chance you get you rant and rave, but you never try to solve problems. -
In case you don’t know how journalism works in your country, the responsibility of journalists is to present the facts-not solve the nations problems. They are responsible for starting the dialogue.pic.twitter.com/Y5dAGBq3qw
-
The NYT used to address important issues, & they did so on a fairly even keel. I grew up "taking tea" with a member of the Sulzberger family; to see the NYTimes fall this far is a personal disappointment. The algorithm is based on how often one tweets – I used to have a 10/10.
-
I will take your word on your previous score. I have seen perfect tens with accounts that have less than a thousand tweets. I am a fairly prolific tweeter at times and don’t garner a warning. Let’s just say you aren’t in my circle of trust.pic.twitter.com/lgYwf8OtFp
-
I appreciate your humorous take. I actually misspoke; I think that the algorithm is based on the time spent actively on Twitter. In other words, when I seem to have no life, the algorithm says that I have no life – a "10/10." 
-
Or it could be your tendency to retweet stuff like this dude who is constantly attacking the Democratic Party. You may not be overtly supporting Drumpf, but undermining the people who are actively challenging his authoritarian regime is divide and conquer bullshit.pic.twitter.com/HkFwxiUH34
-
No, if it were just my tweets against corrupt and sadistic lying war hawk profiteers, I'd still have my 10/10; it must be related to the amount of time spent on Twitter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Always deny facts, so I can believe what I wish. Got it, thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Vote! Empower your voice with a vote. We do not need messages on jackets. We vote.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.