It is a failed system. All votes should be for a person not a group of people, The one who has the most votes should win hands down.
-
-
-
Really, because it's been in continual use for over a century. Facts don't care about your feelings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ranked choice voting is great, it allows people to vote their conscience without being concerned about 'throwing away' their vote
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now we won’t get stuck with a terrible governor like LePage, who won with 38% in a 3-person race.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In voting systems, ranked choices are confusing and do not advance the cause of democracy. Better would be that the top two candidates have a runoff election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Next move: Put Joe Arpaio in charge of the tent cities. Then he can defy another court order to shut them down, be found in contempt, and pardoned all over again.
-
Oops, replied to wrong tweet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#MAGA maine’sful todayful is being watchedwise, for its useful of rankedwise choiceful voting than for who winsfulThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.