Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
nytimes's profile
The New York Times
The New York Times
The New York Times
Verified account
@nytimes

Tweets

The New York TimesVerified account

@nytimes

Where the conversation begins. Follow for breaking news, special reports, RTs of our journalists and more. Visit http://nyti.ms/2FVHq9v  to share news tips.

New York City
nytimes.com
Joined March 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The New York Times‏Verified account @nytimes Jun 5

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to create a wedding cake for a gay couplehttps://nyti.ms/2Jdhd8L 

    5:30 AM - 5 Jun 2018
    • 61 Retweets
    • 159 Likes
    • डां जनार्दन तिवारी DS Augustina DWinata Esther Mwangi Rachel J Larson Petrocam Nigeria Gideon Mush20 Alfian Sibarani Bahero דוד המלך
    94 replies 61 retweets 159 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Spencer Graf‏ @SpencerGraf Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        If a baker who lost a loved one to gun violence had a customer who wanted a cake that resembled a machine gun, should they have to make it? Or, what about an African-American baker whose customer wanted a confederate flag cake?

        4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes
      3. SamHayes‏ @Sammyhayes1964 Jun 5
        Replying to @SpencerGraf @nytimes

        Would be their choice do decide !!

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Mrs Rosefyre‏ @MrsRosefyre Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        SCOTUS ruled only that they didn't get a fair hearing, not that they...and others...could lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples. It specifically stated that was NOT the case. I suggest reading their decision in its entirety. I did.

        0 replies 1 retweet 9 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Juli frank‏ @Julifrank8 Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        Be sure to carry your white heterosexual Christian ID card when you shop.

        2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
      3. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Purnomo‏ @rpermana7 Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        Why didn’t those gays just go to a gay baker?

        2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      3. J‏ @Capn_Positive_ Jun 5
        Replying to @rpermana7 @nytimes

        Because they wanted a federal case

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. Henry Kiggundu‏ @kaigu55 Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        Management reserves the right of admission

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Tribulum‏ @VinylSpinner1 Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        Your headline is so off target, it's almost like you are intentionally trying to misrepresent the real story.

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Halloween Special‏ @droogiejazz Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        Shite headline again from @nytimes . The SC did not rule in baker’s favor, only that he was denied a fair proceeding.

        1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. maddi‏ @mmmmaddi Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        @blahhpaige

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. paige‏ @blahhpaige Jun 5
        Replying to @mmmmaddi @nytimes

        That's smexy evidence

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      4. paige‏ @blahhpaige Jun 5
        Replying to @blahhpaige @mmmmaddi @nytimes

        Is it restraint?

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      5. maddi‏ @mmmmaddi Jun 5
        Replying to @blahhpaige @nytimes

        hell to the yea, shows adherence with the freedom of religion clause of first but calls into question whether in a modern society the bor can ever truly protect all citizens because in protecting one group they fail to protect another *painted nails emoji*

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      6. paige‏ @blahhpaige Jun 5
        Replying to @mmmmaddi @nytimes

        you could use it to argue for abandoning activism by the Roberts court if that comes up again as well because they (sort of) contradict state decisis for obergefell v hodges 🤑

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      7. maddi‏ @mmmmaddi Jun 5
        Replying to @blahhpaige @nytimes

        love it, also-despite abandoning activism, it seems the court remains willing to make controversial decisions seen in caetano v Massachusetts , which in some ways means they are still 'activist' because they display overwhelmingly strict conservatism in a progressive era

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      8. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Uche Adiuku‏ @Chych Jun 5
        Replying to @nytimes

        A baker who has a business totally have the right to say yes and no based on his personal convictions. Unless he conveyed his convictions in an abusive way that he’s supposed to be reprimanded by a court. Freedom of speech. Freedom of expression. But total respect for all!

        1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
      3. Uche Adiuku‏ @Chych Jun 5
        Replying to @Chych @nytimes

        Just in same way I find it absurd if a man commends a woman from what she’s wearing or her hair. It only becomes offensive if there’s sexual undertone.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Uche Adiuku‏ @Chych Jun 5
        Replying to @Chych @nytimes

        I wonder when woman started rejecting commendations on their beautiful looks. And I wonder why some men have degenerated to sexualize women without any sense of morality. Pls let’s not forget our upbringings!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info