She's lying
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
me too. And who's attracted to her pregnant ass
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also, just to be clear, he's in his 80's, I'm sure those press days are long, and he was CLEARLY responding to Michael Caine's story, not being suggestive.
-
Exactly
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Did you actually watch the video - Morgan Freeman was talking to Caine about how he thought a woman was pregnant and she wasn’t - in no way speaking to the journalist
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Journalists today are "career killers"; looking for a story that elevates themselves but ruins another person's life. They're also very lazy, look no further than the Trump reporting as an example. Journalism is a dead profession.
-
That is false.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@nytimes Another perceived, privileged female assuming comments are addressed towards her.#MorganFreeman@mjfree@EmmettTill@EmmettTillTalks Carolyn Bryantpic.twitter.com/johBe9T87Z
-
Does EVERYTHING have to be about race?
-
Hugh Hamilton Reading is fundamental. Race was never mentioned, however a FACT was posted with supporting documentation. When young Emmett Till was LYNCHED by a mod because of false allegations, it was about race. Now, you may slowly place your head back in the sand.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How can NYT run this story? Who is the editor? Did anyone bother watching the video?
-
I think he was talking to Caine about something completely off topic. It doesn't *seem* she was implicated.
-
Caine told a story about how he accidentally suggested a woman was pregnant when she wasn’t. Pause Freeman “I was I had been there... “ [to see Caine’s faux pas]
-
This is... not a good moment for the NYT. Freeman may have some legal action he can pursue, and I wouldn't blame him.
-
The whole article is also rife with speculation. The concrete example is just a misunderstanding, obviously, & the rest of the “accusers” are anonymous. I’m all for exposing bad behavior but this is a huge disservice to the movement, & to journalism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is just dumb. Men hit on women. It's what we do. Looking a woman "up & down" or making a comment, even a lewd comment is not cause for a CNN segment. Try to find a guy in Hollywood who doesn't do that. If you can't I'll give you Charlie Sheen's number.
-
In a professional setting it is considered harassment. She was there to work, not look for a date with an elderly man. Plenty of men are capable of controlling themselves and of flirting in a way that doesn't dehumanise the other person and make them feel like an object.
-
I don't disagree & all she had to do was tell that to him. In any event it's not a national news story.
-
If she was that uncomfortable and taken aback maybe she couldn't say anything. Especially as he is a very powerful individual. This is the problem with putting the onus on women; if these men didn't harrass us in the first place there would be no issue.
-
As a young women who spent years working in hospitality I've been harassed many times. More often than not, particularly when I was in my teens, I didn't feel comfortable talking back to men who are older and/or bigger than me. Even now I don't like to confront men just in case.
-
So what's the solution?
-
I'm truly not being mean when I say this but the answer is women have to grow a backbone.
-
Oh trust me we have backbones. We're just sick of grown men getting away with harassing and abusing us. You truly think all women are just wimps and we should just deal with it? (As if we haven't done exactly that for centuries...)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.