ugh, I hate these arguments but I see the logic
-
-
-
counterargument: his action there is viewpoint neutral
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Related... should public officials be REQUIRED to use Twitter? Seems absurd when you think about it that way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At least those who have devoted time to dunking on Rubio in the replies to his tweets have validation that it bugged him
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
who's writing his tweets? 6 Jan?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Personally, I would say no. If no one can comment, then it is not a public forum. Disabling comments is viewpoint neutral.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Eh no viewpoint discrimination. You don’t have to create a public forum, you just can’t exclude people from one you’ve already created
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the analysis would run the other way. The government does not have an obligation to create a public forum. The question regarding Trump was always what obligations arise once such a forum has been established
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Marco Hates Ratio Rubio
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.