Or why they are entitled to a majority if they can’t win the support of most voters. The GOP is not simply entitled to win elections if people don’t support them.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
im old enough to remember when the conventional wisdom it could only happen if both were done at the same time, since "DC would elect two dems and PR would elect two Rs"
-
That actually happened?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s wild they just admit they can’t and aren’t willing to be viable with non-whites so the goal is to stop them from being represented
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Marty McSally wasn’t even competitive in Arizona...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They know why. We know why. They know that we know why. It's just unsaid at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, if nothing changed except that Democrats gained 4 new Senate seats, Republicans would retain their majority 53-51.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oooh! Oooh! [raising hand] I know why! Because the Republican party's only remaining organizing principle is white resentment, which doesn't play well in PR and DC!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The press apparently feels obligated to not ask.
-
^ This. Why doesn’t he ask McSally, “Why wouldn’t the Republican Party be eager and willing to compete for the votes of Puerto Ricans and Washington DC residents?”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.