Nuclear Vessel

@nuclear_vessel

i'm mad as hell and i'm going to continue to take it

Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @nuclear_vessel

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @nuclear_vessel

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    25. ožu 2019.

    there is no Discourse B

    Poništi
  2. 24. sij

    sick of centrist bros claiming there are numbers between zero and infinity

    Poništi
  3. 24. sij
    Poništi
  4. 24. sij

    is there a way to yell at someone on here without pinging them. do i have to make a screenshot

    Poništi
  5. 24. sij

    the disturbing thing is you can get smart people not to recognize overt propagandist intentions

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    in 1961, the year of bay of pigs, the doomsday clock held still at 7 minutes to midnight. this of course speaks much less to the world's current proximity to catastrophe than it does to the absolutely shameful stupidity of this once almost-reasonable organization.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Casual reminder that the Doomsday Clock is a dumb gimmick that isn't actually based on anything measurable.

    Poništi
  8. 23. sij

    this piece is good for context to these claims

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. ruj 2019.

    lol yeah i made my horse a senator, it's just a horse bro, why are you so triggered by a horse, says a lot about you that you feel you have to attack a horse

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 23. sij

    mnuchin could literally be satan himself and he would still be right on this point

    Poništi
  11. 23. sij

    "whenever i mention my perpetual motion device people just make fun of me for not having a physics degree. that means nothing, though, because if i did have one, i bet they'd just dismiss it!"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 23. sij

    (not necessarily on yglesias's part, but on the part of people like thunberg and aoc)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 23. sij

    the pivot from "listen to the experts" to "expertise, who cares" here is really shameless!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 23. sij

    using an aspirational "it would be nice" target where a cost-benefit-optimal policy would be appropriate is EXACTLY the kind of mistake people make when they don't have an economics degree!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 23. sij

    you don't have to know any criminology to see that reducing crime by 95% requires pretty extreme measures. but then maybe your opinions about what measures are worth the gain aren't very valuable!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 23. sij

    yes, it would be absurdly hard to limit warming to 1.5 deg. so maybe let's not do that then!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 23. sij

    dishonest as hell, as usual for yglesias. just because the trump administration is to the right of economists doesn't mean thunberg isn't way to the left of economists. the "1.5" in "let's limit warming to 1.5 deg" did not come from a cost benefit analysis

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 2. sij

    mitigating climate change in the present is basically an unusually inefficient way to send people in the future money. however, exponential compounding is a big deal, so even inefficient alternatives can be net positive by (possibly-naive) utilitarian standards

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 2. sij

    mitigating climate change in the first world is basically an unusually inefficient way to send people in the third world money. however, global inequality is large, so even inefficient attempts to address it can be net positive by (possibly-naive) utilitarian standards

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 29. pro 2019.

    don't worry, insect populations are plummeting because of climate change

    Poništi
  21. 29. pro 2019.

    i wonder if he realizes he just argued reducing emissions doesn't matter

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·