Conversation

Replying to
I agree that’s the critical question. One possibility that seems reasonably likely to me (based on aïve SIR math) is that we wait until ICUs are overflowing and that’s too late for interventions to make a difference. This isn’t compatible with what we saw in India/UK, though. 🤷‍♂️
1
1
Replying to
I’m not sure too late to make a difference would mean? It could mean ICUs are still overwhelmed for a while, but unless population immunity is high, why wouldn’t measures make some difference?
1
1
Replying to
Here’s how I’d see that happening: suppose that we’re pretty far into a big exponential wave. By the time the ICUs fill up (30/100k in ICU), that means that, say, 3000/100k = 3% have covid (at 1% chance of needing ICU given infection).
1
Replying to and
Assume it takes two weeks to need an ICU bed from infection. At Delta growth rates (doubling roughly weekly or so?) that means you could end up with a peak load of >10% already “locked in” if you wait until ICUs are full to act.
1
Replying to and
I actually don’t think that can happen in many places (like the US northeast) because they’re less than 10% of the population with immunity (via infection or vaccination) away from herd immunity. But you can still overwhelm ICUs.
2
1
Replying to
I’m very uncertain one this. My current best guess is that there is enough sterilizing immunity from vaccines to make most vaccinated people a rounding error as *sources* of covid infection at a society level. If that’s true, this conclusion holds.
1
1
Replying to and
One interesting point that supports this: my home province of Ontario has high Delta prevalence but has seen a much more moderate increase in cases compared to the Northeast, with only slightly higher vaccination rates (<10% difference). They have kept more NPIs, though.
1
1