Conversation

Replying to
Almost certainly is, like, a 1 in 1,000 hazard ratio, right? If that's the case, there will definitely be hundreds to thousands of Delta deaths in vaccinated people in the US alone, if my math is right. And separately, there's a lot of harm that I care about other than death.
1
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
For sure, although I, personally, would want one even after seeing e.g., animal challenge trial data. The thing I really wish is that we'd started these trials in April when we identified Delta, in which case we'd be done with all of that by now..
1
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
Well, yes, but I expect that they would have done that under a different regulatory (and vaccine purchasing) regime, which is what I would advocate for. I don't think it's fair to pin this on the companies in this case.
1
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to and
We could also see how regulatory choices affect decision making by companies on the margin. For example, the R&D costs for enough trial data to convince me to take a booster dose are small: probably less than $100k. At the price I'd pay for one, it's easy to make that back.
1
Show replies
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
I also wouldn't prefer a world with no regulatory structure at all. But, this thought experiment means that there *is* a regulatory burden. And there is a continuum of burdens that can be developed, for different benefits.
1
Show replies