A particularly good Slate Star Codex piece on the societal cost of everything being default illegal for 10 years and $X0 million to a billion in medicine:
Conversation
Replying to
Appears this piece may have been victim of one of the internet's systemic problems.
Quote Tweet
Seems that @slatestarcodex story about an old FDA incident was very inaccurate jabberwocking.com/a-3-part-story
Show this thread
2
11
As I understand it, the inaccuracies were in a previous piece about the FDA in general, and "Details Of The Infant Fish Oil Story" is a correction with a detailed (and hopefully correct) story that is based on the same sources as the jobberwocking.com one.
2
But Kevin Drum's blog post is also critical of Scott's followup. Probably worth reading Drum's post rather than assuming SA's followup corrects all the issues.
1
Right, I read it and it's highly critical of the conclusions of Scott's second piece but doesn't seem to take issue with the facts of the case (presumably because it's based on the same sources?).
1
Show replies