I don’t actually have a strong opinion on mask mandates, but one point that IMO is under discussed:
When this all got started there was a shortage of good (n95 or better) masks! Source control matters more when people can’t unilaterally block most aerosols, right?
Conversation
So when people say, “mask up indoors even if vaccinated to protect the immunocompromised since sterilizing immunity isn’t perfect”… I’ll do it, but I hope the vulnerable people are wearing at least n95s! And I have seen zero public health messaging so far on that point.
2
2
33
Replying to
A few months ago, I was advising someone who had some proximity to official-ish decision makers on the subject of recommending (K)N95 respirators. Apparently public health people were (are?) still worried that the general public will divert supply from healthcare workers.
I was, uh, pretty upset by this, especially since it was in the middle of a big wave and before most people could get vaccinated. I would *hope* that every healthcare site is aggressively procuring respirators (in case, uh, another boat gets stuck in the Suez Canal), but... 🤷♂️
1
9
Replying to
Yeah, if only we had public health officials who saw dishonestly manipulating the public as a costly thing they should approximately never do…
1
16
Show replies
Mask sensitivity to fit is a function of filter quality. Masks that actually work have to have basically zero gaps. They then need proper doffing, and for reuse need to be sterilized.
2
I agree, but the perfect should not be the enemy of the good? I trust microCOVIDs numbers and I am pretty sure that normal people can get a fit that gives a 3x reduction in aerosol inhalation and 6x reduction in aerosol production in a typical (K)N95.
1
1
Show replies