This is really interesting, because it's in contrast to how I want building design to work. Part of what I want to buy when I purchase shelter is "someone has thought through and designed around the many possible extreme events", but I don't think that's the case at all.
Conversation
Replying to
Yeah. In general I feel like the entire design of this building is the opposite of that - it just feels like everything is superficially fine but nobody has thought through any of the details of what living in it would actually be like.
1
1
Replying to
"superficially fine but nobody has thought through any of the details of what living in it" is something that I get unreasonably angry about. I don't want listings to tell me about the fancy bathroom tiles; I want to know the technical details about the HVAC systems!
2
And it gets really weird when you start talking about resilience to rare events. I would pay extra to rent in a building that was more resilient to flooding, but I have no idea how to learn that.
1
1
Replying to
I think fundamentally there's a market for lemons here. The cost to disaster proof a building is nontrivial, and it's almost impossible to know in advance of a disaster whether it's actually been done, so it becomes price ineffective to offer it.
1
1
Replying to
I guess this is sort of the function that building codes are supposed to have? But they don't seem to be doing a good job. My last apartment had a gas oven/stove, but literally no active ventilation except a bathroom fan. Apparently that's up to code in Massachusetts!
1
This investigation started because I was always sleepy after cooking. Turns out that 2000 ppm CO2 will do that 😱
1
Replying to
Gosh, yes.
I got a CO2 monitor recently and fortunately it turns out my flat is fine if the windows are open and rapidly ramps up to about 800 ppm if not. I haven't seen if it goes higher than that, but probably.
1
Replying to
That's pretty typical for indoor CO2, unfortunately. I'm usually content with ~700 ppm.
If you haven't already, it's fun to try exercising in a ~closed room with a CO2 monitor. Makes it very clear that carbon mostly leaves our bodies in our breath.
1
Replying to
Oh, mine is usually in the 400-500 region if I keep the space ventilated, which I try to do.
1
Replying to
That's really nice! I do the same during the, uh, 6 weeks a year when the weather is pleasant enough to have the window open.😅 I am irritated that a good solution to this problem (heat recovery ventilators) has existed for decades but mostly doesn't get used.
Replying to
Ah, yeah, one of the upsides of London's very mediocre weather is that there aren't many days of the year where having an open window is unworkable.
1