Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Nicholas Schiefer
@nschiefer
I agree that partial extinction is real, and that existential risk is uniquely, uh, "fun" to talk about, and therefore requires extra hygiene. I think reasonable people can disagree about the worth of living after losing e.g., most of a family.
1
1
Nicholas Schiefer
@nschiefer
Replying to
@nschiefer
I don't have the hubris to say that *I* would be that resilient, but I am very grateful that some of my ancestors (some of whom did lose ~their entire family and possibly, like, almost their entire village?) found a way to keep going.
1
1
Nicholas Schiefer
@nschiefer
Replying to
@nschiefer
I've never thought about the possibility that we might just... lose the will/resilience/desire to keep going, rather than gallantly rebuilding. That's some serious stuff, and as you say probably much more likely than total extinction.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Nicholas Schiefer
@nschiefer
I dunno how I would rate it personally. I think I'd hope that I could keep future humans in mind, who would only suffer in the shadow of that horror rather than experience it directly. And that seems better than not existing, at least.
1
1
uncatherio
@uncatherio
Replying to
@nschiefer
also fwiw if you believe that undergoing a partial-extinction trauma would "permanently and drastically curtail humanity's potential" then in fact, by Bostrom's definition (which is somewhat confusing for this reason), you believe that partial-extinction is an "existential risk"
1
1