Conversation

What if the rest of the world is a distraction from the billionaire space race? I find it at least a little likely looking back in a thousand years we say getting to space was the main thing that mattered, and we 60 years of evidence the way to progress in space is ego battles
15
281
Inspired by like 15 different articles in my tl that say “the billionaire space race is a distraction from the rest of the problems in the world”
3
34
Mostly I think space matters and many other things matter too. If each of us thinks hard about where we want humanity to go and which one or two problems we care about most and devote ourselves fully to them, I think humanity will have a good portfolio of what it’s working on
2
55
In a sense the real distraction is practically every problem that isn’t one you’re personally devoting your whole life to The world moves forward when small groups of people work on projects they care about deeply for decades
2
108
I know the term “contrarian” is among the most mocked right now, but I do think if others don’t approve of a project you both just can’t stop thinking about and think is important, it’s strong evidence for devoting your life to it
Quote Tweet
Replying to @nickcammarata
"not allowed to devote yourself to a problem we don't approve of" is something i got hit with so many times growing up and it warms my soul to see people not only immune to it but full of indomitable energy / ambition.
1
42
(Also the idea that the word contrarian is mocked is so sad, and exactly what Rene Girard — the philosopher upstream of all of this discourse — would have predicted)
1
17
I’m not particularly pro space btw, I’m just pro ambitious technical projects* that could change things for the better. Space fits the bill * I’ve come to believe “it’s technically hard” is very good evidence for why something good hasn’t been done yet, the $20 on the ground
Quote Tweet
Replying to @gfodor
Yeah I don’t actually think it’s space 😙 but I think it’s a thing with a lot of the properties of space (technical, high-impact, people generally against it) like AI, psychedelics or something else. And it’s hard to predict which one! So I support anything with these properties
2
39
Just to be super clear I’d be pro working on space, ai, psychedelics, etc if publicly funded, but over the last 50y it’s become obvious that as humanity we don’t care enough collectively to work on high upside risky projects. Only path forward is through individual incentives
5
37