Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @nrgomes

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @nrgomes

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    8. sij
    Poništi
  2. - Stop subsidizing oil & mining companies worldwide and make them accountable (meaning: paying) for the negative environmental impacts they cause locally & worldwide, and for the regeneration of the ecosystems they explore, for at least a 50 year period after closing operations.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. - Prohibit by law, with huge fines, the production & use of pesticides and herbicides to produce food: work with natural cycles instead and use and practices instead. This is key to regenerate pollinators' populations (bees) worldwide.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. - Prohibit by law, with huge fines, the production & use of plastics for packaging and distributing food and drinks: use glass and completely biodegradable materials as an alternative. Change this system from the inside (production and distribution) and not the edges (citizens).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. - Fund the rebuilding of local socio-natural ecosystems around the world using validated practices like and to regenerate the land and help local people earn a decent yield. - Make an international crime and a crime against humanity.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. Some examples of what states and should do today to protect and planet : - Protect rainforests worldwide by international law: these are sacred biodiversity places. - Regenerate degraded native forests everywhere and also protect them by international law.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. And how can we do that? My answer was given above: Use as a platform to enable . is about our collective interests, in this case, our own survivability as a species, and protecting national & world interests, aka, the planet we inhabit.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. Only by helping itself in a fast way we may have a chance to survive as a species this century. If we don't embody this new bold today as a society, we all be gone due to , destruction of , and yes, .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. X: How that relates to and the underlying factors you enumerated in the beginning: wrong intent, imbalance, and negative externalities? Me: Let's start with : societies need a new one. As of today, the new intent should be the .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. And by I mean the right to control your life and own assets (excluding the strategic ones owned by the society at large, the national interests) and to spur innovation through competition, meaning markets free from monopolies, oligopolies & rent-seekers.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. X: Explain. Me: Use as a platform to enable . means the rule of law, security & opportunities for all, and of course, all state's strategic assets in the hands of the societies that paid them in the first place to protect your national interests.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. X: No. That's . Me: Exactly. X: But is compatible with ? Me: Remember the wrong intent at the beginning: if you look at capitalism and socialism as mere tools that we can use for a greater common good, yes, states/societies should use both.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. Poništi
  14. Poništi
  15. Me: Not only that but a strong public sector that owns and manages the 's like roads, railways, ports, airports, communication networks, hospitals, schools, and so forth. Call it "national interests" if you want. And this is not capitalism, is it?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. It's called rent-seeking. And by the way, China state-owned companies will be more than happy to buy western states' strategic assets by acquiring those western rent-seeking companies, I'm sure. X: So, what you are saying is that every western state needs a public sector?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. X: But even so, the private sector is great in managing infrastructure assets like communication networks, roads, hospitals, schools, ... Me: No they aren't. What they are great at, is on extracting huge profits from those strategic assets already paid by the taxpayer.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. X: But the private sector is much better than the public sector in managing all kinds of assets. Me: If you think that way, you really don't know the huge amount of waste that exists in most companies. There's a reason why big consultancy companies are, well... big.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. Also, don't forget that still today in all Western countries most of the scientific breakthroughs don't come from the private sector, but from the public sector. Think Internet, vaccines, space technologies and so forth, all paid by the taxpayer.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. Me: Look at the Scandinavian countries and especially China: all these countries use capitalism as a tool to drive innovation, and in the case of China, to also dominate other countries by buying important stakes in big western corporations through their state-owned companies.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. X: Isn't capitalism the best ideology ever invented to govern a whole society and pull millions out of poverty? Me: If you are a liberal/neoliberal you may think that way. But you are wrong. X: Prove me wrong.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·