@nouswaves im not sure what you mean
-
-
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive *ism = Prejudice + Power ^ Redefinition in order for activists to win more arguments.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@psygnisfive My joke about 'structural bigotry' is meta. When people are called out on redefining word they often go from Bailey to Motte.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @nouswaves
@psygnisfive So not signalling or a belief but a preferred position that is difficult to defend.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@nouswaves i think this is all tangential to the issue i was referring to :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive I don't see how it's tangential. You asked binary question with two answers and I added a third option?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@nouswaves the situation you're referring to is a different one than i'm referring to tho they look similar at a high level of abstraction1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive The original tweet made it look like this was about people insisting they cannot be bigoted without power.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@nouswaves power and marginalization are not the same thing2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@psygnisfive Marginalisation is the wrong end of a power dynamic. In my mind
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.