Could it be that becoming a great thinker/(doer?) REQUIRES that sort of focuses reiterative, remixing, giving you a signature style?
-
-
Replying to @visakanv
It must be perfectly rational at each step of the process to choose to develop existing successes further than to take weird random leaps
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @visakanv
Are there eg's of successful thinker-doers who are weirdly inconsistent? Da Vinci did a great many things but you see how it all connects
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @visakanv
Or does it always seem to connect no matter what? I was going somewhere with this: Can artists escape inevitably boring their audiences?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @visakanv
The pragmatic part of me thinks it's not worth worrying about that. An artist's first obligation is to make art. That's hard enough!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @visakanv
The straightforward answers seem trivial: play to a different crowd, use a different medium, etc etc. I'm missing something here...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@visakanv I suspect you can be inconsistent but you will be less productive.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@sebinsua yeah you lose the compounding benefits. A few shallow pools rather than a deep well2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.