@GabrielDuquette I think you should create terminology.
-
-
Replying to @nouswaves
πous〜es Retweeted Mirjana
@GabrielDuquette I was thinking about this: https://twitter.com/siddhigal/status/605318414077456385 … "Tracking useful reality."πous〜es added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
πous〜es Retweeted πous〜es
@GabrielDuquette When I thought about coherence I thought about biases that enable us to easily perceive things:https://twitter.com/sebinsua/status/605327532922142720 …πous〜es added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nouswaves
@GabrielDuquette Like pointillism. But the reality that is hard to "track" might be just as important.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@GabrielDuquette Basically I think that your questions and perceptions on that page are great but it's meandering.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@GabrielDuquette As awkward as it might be to invent your own terminology, doing so will afford you reusable tools. Albeit prototypes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@GabrielDuquette I guess you remember this: http://carcinisation.com/2014/09/13/ketchup-and-artistic-effectiveness/ … The 'visual associations' there were very good. Beyond terminology.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.