The more I use Spotify, the more I see how absurd is this whole purchasing thing.
-
-
Replying to @z6lc7vj7v
@z6lc7vj7v thought you meant in general and that set my mind racing.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @z6lc7vj7v
@z6lc7vj7v Nice thing about ownership is that it can't be revoked easily. You're paying for a social contract that's hard to tamper with.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nouswaves
@sebinsua Ownership is still a contract. I see no why society wouldn’t evolve to offer me better contracts more routinely.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @z6lc7vj7v
@sebinsua Specifically, by better I mean less resources wasted. There’s a huge compound cost of all the mostly idle things I own.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @nouswaves
@z6lc7vj7v The need for ownership is due to principle-agent complications, and that's obviated by their transparent and static application.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nouswaves
@z6lc7vj7v The way I see it: Maintenance/insurance cost of ownership of resources vs principle-agent cost(s) of rental of resources.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@z6lc7vj7v Phone contracts are my best example of "something badly wrong". I am locked in for 24 months and recently had tethering removed.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@z6lc7vj7v I have this thought on wanting a "put option" on contracts that misbehave.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.