Let's suppose you want to hire an "A-player" and you want him to commit long-term to your companies vision.
-
-
Replying to @nouswaves
He could get £X on the contracting market and additionally affords himself Y free-time whenever he chooses allowing controlled optionality.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
If your offer is a low % of X and a low, rigid preset Y this will immediately set off alarm bells.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
Ask yourself whether you want your "A-players" to be able to make sound economic decisions or not?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nouswaves
Even those that are mathematically illiterate, non-capitalist and easily swayed by emotion might still intuitively sense your value leakage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
You don't have to be a genius to know your worth. Hence men and women don't easily settle in long-term relationships with anybody.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nouswaves
Basically what I'm saying is that if you're looking to deal with A-players then you should court them as if you're an A-employer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
The games you play are ultimately fragile and the more you attempt to detach yourself from the market the more so this is the case.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
All human systems are gamed. But you can't fool each other long-term.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.