@sebinsua We're going in circles, I already answered that: https://twitter.com/shit_so_says/status/439410986194579456 …
https://twitter.com/shit_so_says/status/439410034502799360 …https://twitter.com/shit_so_says/status/439408853449723904 …
@shit_so_says Your implied assertion is: "all sentences that refer to something must refer to it by its explicit definition"?
If so: false.
-
-
@shit_so_says That is simply not how language is used. -
@sebinsua From my POV, your subjective interpretation is adding/inventing a lot of content that just isn't there. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.