@shit_so_says It's pedantic to assume that somebody that mentions language-level features/signifiers is making a general answer.
-
-
Replying to @nouswaves
@sebinsua It's wrong to write a specialized comment to a general answer to a general question.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shit_so_says
@shit_so_says I'd try to accommodate your answer but I think you're just being deliberately confusing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@shit_so_says Your tweet seemed pedantic, unaccommodating and as if you were deliberately ignoring the cues in his comment.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@sebinsua I just showed that the comment is objectively wrong, in .NET or anywhere else. Accusing me of being pedantic is an ad-hominem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shit_so_says
@shit_so_says I just called your tweet pedantic, not yourself. It was not ad-hominem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@shit_so_says And I do not think you've proved anything. However I don't believe in winning or losing arguments only finding truth.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@sebinsua It's very simple really: 'static', 'new' are red herrings. The real problem is side effects.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shit_so_says
@shit_so_says I said that they are signifiers of wrongdoing. Think 'code smell'.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nouswaves
@shit_so_says Seeing lots of 'new' should imply that you should check for side-effects.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@shit_so_says It does not mean that this is the case but it is a signal to look closer.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.