feedback for ingroup/metarational twitter: imho UST/ingroup is biased in the direction of rationality/current scientific orthodoxy (despite attempting to transcend/include rationality) and overly averse to the value of 'the ineffable' / learning via direct experience thoughts?https://twitter.com/_jordan_bates/status/924124150939099137 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @_jordan_bates
i don't think that's true. (though like you i am wrong.) ust is way more playful than that. it is grounded in the way you speak, so can filter novelty in the way described. it's sort of "people that enjoy the alchemy of making the ineffable effable and the effable ineffable".
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
Replying to @nouswaves @_jordan_bates
politically, they are conscious of the possibility of everything not being as it seems, so there is a sort of soft-to-hard cynicism and lack of rigidity of thought that /hardens at the point of opinion/ and a desire for the safety of alts to shitpost and experiment from.
2:41 AM - 10 Jan 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.