Why Bayesianism is unworkable: it assumes a fixed hypothesis space. Explanation by @nostalgebraist h/t @garybasin http://nostalgebraist.tumblr.com/post/161645122124/bayes-a-kinda-sorta-masterpost …pic.twitter.com/3z4gDxj4Lv
-
does
@nostalgebraist think these two results are equally useless as the other one, though?
i actually haven't looked at those 2 papers, largely bc they got bad external reviews in the openphil eval http://files.openphilanthropy.org/files/Grants/MIRI/consolidated_public_reviews.pdf …
-
-
+ at the time of that eval, the LI paper was not yet published and MIRI said it would be "more impressive" than those others
-
(see http://www.openphilanthropy.org/focus/global-catastrophic-risks/potential-risks-advanced-artificial-intelligence/machine-intelligence-research-institute-general-support#Potential_for_improvement … ) so if i was not impressed w LI paper i figured those others were not worth looking at in detail
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.