more seriously, i know people argued hard against positive manifold, but do we know they wouldn't do the same for fitness?
-
-
Replying to @nostalgebraist @SilverVVulpes
i can easily imagine my alt. universe having a fitness!Gould, et al. are you saying you find that hard to to imagine?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
no, I'm saying it's an important omission because part of the point of the book is to argue against those! and that they…
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @nostalgebraist
(Gould, Gardner, Fodor etc.) have more of an impact than you think. AND that it isn't as obvious g factor is a given.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
OK, i think we are evaluating the book on different standards. i fully admit i am not the target audience.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
you're probably the target audience of the "arcane and nerdy disagreements" Stu decided to skip over in his basic into :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
ah! but my exact complaint is that one /can't/ skip over those disagreements in the way he does (cf my thread w him)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
so my disagreements with you are a) What I said about what people expected, including making analogy unfair by lack of it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
just to follow up on that, i think a) may involve conflation of "intuitively surprising" and "worth contesting academically"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist @SilverVVulpes
like, "smart" is a word. the "man on the street" talks about general intelligence all the time.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
academics have higher standards of proof, so ofc some will contest results even if they agree with naive intuition.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.