expecting that if X person/kid it's bad at maths, then at least he should be good at reading, and/or viceversa
-
so my disagreements with you are a) What I said about what people expected, including making analogy unfair by lack of it
just to follow up on that, i think a) may involve conflation of "intuitively surprising" and "worth contesting academically"
-
-
like, "smart" is a word. the "man on the street" talks about general intelligence all the time.
-
academics have higher standards of proof, so ofc some will contest results even if they agree with naive intuition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm sorry if I'm being too insistent in this,but it WAS contested academically,and it was surprising despite people denying
-
like I feel I'm missing something here, but I already agreed you don't have to read history of intuitions just to argue me
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.