That's an argument regarding *why* they correlate. Different to what laymen or educated people expected/expect
-
you're probably the target audience of the "arcane and nerdy disagreements" Stu decided to skip over in his basic into :)
ah! but my exact complaint is that one /can't/ skip over those disagreements in the way he does (cf my thread w him)
-
-
so my disagreements with you are a) What I said about what people expected, including making analogy unfair by lack of it
-
just to follow up on that, i think a) may involve conflation of "intuitively surprising" and "worth contesting academically"
-
like, "smart" is a word. the "man on the street" talks about general intelligence all the time.
-
academics have higher standards of proof, so ofc some will contest results even if they agree with naive intuition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.