That's an argument regarding *why* they correlate. Different to what laymen or educated people expected/expect
-
trust me, i have met lots of people who know of "g" only via gould's book, and that sort of thing
my perspective is, intelligence research has some issues at a v fundamental level and a good defense should tackle those
-
-
this is sort of unfair, in that there are "easier" misconceptions to dispel. otoh, mistakes by enemies aren't successes
-
mistakes of creationists aren't success of evolutionary theory but people didn't expect evolution,argued after proposed
-
(comparison of kind, not degree)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ok,that's different from comment that triggered me(ppl really did =,some expected anticorrelation!)https://twitter.com/nostalgebraist/status/846559046039613440 …
-
but that's personal pet peeve at stuff declared "obvious" after entablished despite being ultra controversial back then
-
in science and in general. If I projected a false positive because I jump at that impression, apologies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.