@xriskology just letting you know: i storified our exchange and linked to it in a tumblr post. http://nostalgebraist.tumblr.com/post/149187735559/i-warned-you-about-stern-bro …
-
-
Replying to @nostalgebraist
An oddly uncharitable tone to the post, at least to my eye, but otherwise looks fine to me. Wasn't expecting those...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xriskology
yeah i am being kinda snarky. i should be honest: repeated use of stern # by xrisk ppl DOES lower my confidence in xrisk ppl
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nostalgebraist @xriskology
bc i think it comes from misunderstanding of stern, and understanding + integrating research like stern is part of xrisk job
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nostalgebraist @xriskology
that's harsh but i hope you can see how it is the correct update to make, given my existing beliefs
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @xriskology
to my eye, your third para is misleading bc it makes it sound as if the 0.1 # is due to, or related to, climate change
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist @xriskology
if i didn't know background, i'd have read it as meaning "stern said climate was top priority in bc of extinction concerns"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
*in part bc of extinction concerns
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.