@xriskology thank you for linking to my article in your @motherboard piece. but imo the stern number doesn't work here even w the caveat
-
-
Replying to @nostalgebraist @xriskology
stern's main interest is in defending an "approx zero" time discount rate against others
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist @xriskology
see refs herehttp://bruegel.org/2012/04/blogs-review-the-discounting-debate-in-climate-change-mitigation/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist @xriskology
others defend higher rate not bc of higher extinction prob but bc of other ethics (eg rawlsianism)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
nostalgebraist Retweeted nostalgebraist
tweet here was meant to be part of that series; missed it bc i am still getting used to twitterhttps://twitter.com/nostalgebraist/status/766429915784810496 …
nostalgebraist added,
6:28 PM - 18 Aug 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.