@mormo_music @JonasKyratzes so where is the uncertainty about the direction of our influence?
-
-
Replying to @nostalgebraist
@nostalgebraist uncertainty comes from uncertainty about whether current natural trend (medium to longterm timescale) is warming or cooling.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mormo_music
@nostalgebraist If natural trend = cooling, then human action that increases temp by lesser amount is _slowing_ climate change.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mormo_music
@mormo_music Our CO2 emissions (and other emissions) are changing the climate. That's climate change.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
@nostalgebraist You're defining climate change in a way that makes it compatible w/ weather/temp/sealevel all staying exactly thesame. odd.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mormo_music
@mormo_music Natural trends are slow. If there's a wind pushing my car backwards at 0.01 mph, and I start the car and drive at 30 mph . . .1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
@mormo_music ... am I "slowing the natural trend"? No, I'm adding a much stronger trend in the opposite direction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
@nostalgebraist Like I said:If natural trend=cooling, then humanaction that increases temp by lesser amount = slowing climate change. Agree?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mormo_music
@mormo_music Yes. But we knew that the "lesser amount" premise is false. The climate is changing faster (magnitude) than it would w/o us.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nostalgebraist
@nostalgebraist "The climate is changing faster (magnitude) than it would w/o us." How do 'we' know this?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@mormo_music Temperature and other records show sharp change in past century, outside the usual range of internal variability.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.